The Allahabad High Court on Wednesday dismissed as “withdrawn” a batch of petitions difficult the UP Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversions Ordinance, 2020. While the courtroom dismissed the petitions holding that they challenged the constitutional validity of the Ordinance and never the Act, it held that the petitioners have been at liberty to file a recent batch of petitions difficult the Act.
The batch of petitions was heard by a division bench of Chief Justice Sanjay Yadav and Justice Siddharth Verma on Wednesday. Additional Advocate General Manish Goel, showing for the federal government, mentioned, “The court has dismissed the petitions as withdrawn, as the Act has come into force, while the dismissed petitions were challenging the Ordinance.”
He mentioned a petition, which was filed by the Association for Advocacy and Legal Initiatives difficult the Act and never the Ordinance, was thought-about by the courtroom and spot was issued to the state authorities. “A discover was issued to the state, asking it to file a reply to the petition inside 4 weeks. The matter has been listed for the week starting August 2,” Goyal mentioned.
The UP cupboard had accepted the ordinance on November 24 final 12 months and it was accepted and signed by Governor Anandiben Patel on November 28. In March this 12 months, the ordinance grew to become an Act after it was handed by the Assembly. Under the UP Prohibition of Unlawful Conversions Act, 2021, a wedding can be declared “null and void” if the conversion is for that function solely, and those that want to change their faith after marriage should apply to the district Justice of the Peace. have to.
The Act states that no individual shall convert from one faith to a different by way of misrepresentation, power, undue affect, coercion, inducement or any fraudulent means or by marriage, nor shall any individual abet, clarify Or plot. such a conversion.
Shashwat Anand, one of many legal professionals who filed the petition, mentioned that he would quickly file a recent petition. Anand had filed his petition on behalf of activist and lawyer Saurav Kumar difficult the constitutional validity of the ordinance.
.
With inputs from TheIndianEXPRESS
