Asset seize case: Punjab and Haryana HC says there isn’t any restrict to human greed, rejects bail plea of ​​liquor baron

0
311

Dismissing the anticipatory bail plea of ​​liquor baron Arvind Singla within the alleged property grabbing case, the Punjab and Haryana High Court mentioned the investments made by him are for private progress as there isn’t any restrict to human greed.

Singla’s counsel had contended that the petitioner was a outstanding liquor contractor and had invested the cash on the behest of a property vendor. The expenses of kidnapping, forgery and trespass don’t pertain to the petitioner and therefore, he’s entitled to anticipatory bail.

However, Justice Anupinder Singh Grewal noticed, “The petitioner could also be a billionaire, however the funding made by him within the property doesn’t look like real and is actually not for nation constructing or employment technology. It is for private progress, as human greed is aware of no bounds… He is alleged to be the mastermind and instrumental in getting ready faux and cast paperwork for switch of property to allegedly obtain an quantity exceeding one crore. . Grewal commented.

The counsel for the petitioner had argued that the property was bought by co-accused Khalendra Singh Kadyan, and thereafter, he approached property vendor Ashok Arora together with one Sanjeev Mahajan, who approached the petitioner to put money into the property. Thereafter, a legitimate GPA was executed by Rahul Mehta in favor of Kadyan and the petitioner to the extent of 67 per cent and 33 per cent respectively.

UT’s counsel Ashu Mohan Punchhi argued that the petitioner had colluded with the co-accused within the case and a sale settlement was entered into between Rahul Mehta and co-accused Kadyan. Thereafter, the petitioner entered into an settlement with Kadyan and made an funding for the acquisition of 33 per cent share. Also, the petitioner was the mastermind and had manipulated the data of the property workplace with the connivance of different accused. The petitioner himself has acquired an quantity of Rs 1.28 crore.

Therefore, Justice Grewal rejected Singla’s bail software.

.
With inputs from TheIndianEXPRESS

Leave a reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here