Taking unprecedented steps, a senior decide of the Calcutta High Court has written to all judges of the High Court, together with Acting Chief Justice Rajesh Bindal, questioning the intervention of the Acting Chief Justice within the Narada Sting case in transferring the case. The bail granted to HC and 4 TMC leaders by the CBI court docket was stayed.
“The High Court ought to do its work collectively. Our conduct is in opposition to the order of the High Court. We are confined to a joke. Therefore, I’m requesting all of us to revive the scenario by taking such steps, together with calling a full court docket, if crucial, for the aim of reaffirming the sanctity of our guidelines and our unwritten code of conduct. goes. A letter accessed by The Indian Express.
Letter on 24 May, someday after CBI strikes Supreme Court Challenging the order of a division bench of the High Court directing the detention of ministers Subrata Mukherjee, Firhad Hakim, TMC MLA Madan Mitra and the previous Mayor of Kolkata. Sowan ChatterjeeIn the Narada bribery case, all raised plenty of questions over procedural gaps in accepting the CBI petition and handing it over to a bench headed by the performing Chief Justice.
The letter questioned, “Whether the High Court exercises power in the case of transfer of a criminal case, at that stage, on its own initiative, can pass an order of adjournment is the second question.”
On 21 May, a home arrest was ordered, whereas Acting Chief Justice Rajesh Bindal and Justice Arijit Banerjee expressed their opinion in regards to the case and a big five-judge bench could be set as much as hear the petition. While Justice Banerjee was in favor of granting bail, caretaker CJ Bindal supported the detention.
In his letter, the senior decide questioned why a five-judge bench is constituted when a 3rd resolution is often added to a break up judgment case within the bench.
“Chapter VII provides for reference to a full bench. Such references arise when the view taken by one division bench is inconsistent with the approach taken by another division bench,” the letter said.
On May 17, Four TMC leaders arrested The bail was granted by the CBI however on the identical day by a delegated CBI court docket. However, the CBI filed a petition within the High Court urging the judges to maneuver the case from the particular CBI court docket to the High Court, declaring the proceedings within the company court docket invalid on May 17 and conducting the proceedings afresh. .
The CBI made a plea that the CBI court docket had granted bail to the 4 leaders “in a cloud of mobocracy, pressure, intimidation and violence and there is a void in the eyes of the law”. The High Court heard the case after court docket hours and stayed the bail granted by the particular court docket.
“The rules on the appeals side require a motion seeking transfer, either on the civil or criminal side, also headed by a single judge. However, the First Division Bench raised the matter, considering it a writ petition, “Wrote the decide.
CBI’s communication cited that TMC made efforts within the trial court docket, “The congestion factor may be on the basis of merit for the motion’s decision, but whether the First Division Bench can take it and hear it as a writ petition Can continue. First question, “the letter stated.
.
With inputs from TheIndianEXPRESS
