The Center has requested the Supreme Court to bar the election of seats reserved for Other Backward Classes (OBC) within the upcoming native physique elections or deprive the reserved class from notifying OBC seats as common seats for 5 years. and vice versa. pursuits.
“Any intervention at this stage will deprive a person belonging to the OBC community for five years, which cannot be called a short period by any logic…”, the Center mentioned.
The authorities mentioned the questions raised “are of great public importance and have a pan-India impact…”
Stating that “the upliftment of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes has been the top priority of the Central Government,” the Center in its software to the apex court docket mentioned that “any inadequate representation of OBCs in local self-government defeats The very purpose, intent and purpose of the idea of ​​decentralization of power and taking governance to the grassroots level”.
The authorities mentioned that it needs to be made a celebration to the matter “so as to render necessary assistance to this Hon’ble Court on the larger issue of implementation of OBC reservation in all local body elections in the country”.
The apex court docket had on December 17 stayed the election to the OBC class seats, observing that the triple check laid down by it has not been accomplished earlier than making provision for such quota and directed that the mentioned seats be transferred to the final class. Proceed solely after re-notified as
Earlier this month, the Supreme Court had stayed the election of 27 per cent seats reserved for the OBC class within the Maharashtra native physique elections. On December 15, the court docket requested the Maharashtra authorities and the State Election Commission (SEC) to re-notify 27 per cent seats as common class seats and maintain elections for them.
The bench was listening to an software filed by Bhopal Zilla Panchayat President Manmohan Nagar in relation to a petition filed earlier than the Madhya Pradesh High Court.
Nagar had approached the High Court difficult the constitutional validity of the Madhya Pradesh Ordinance—Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj and Gram Swaraj (Amendment) Act, revealed on November 21, 2021. In his petition, it was mentioned that this ordinance violates Article 243-D. Provision for reservation of seats for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and ladies in Panchayats in any respect ranges by rotation. However, the ordinance did away with the necessity for rotation by reserving seats – beforehand reserved for one class – once more for a similar class.
With the High Court rejecting the interim aid, Nagar approached the Supreme Court, which on 15 December mentioned he had not challenged the December 4, 2021 State Election Commission notification on elections and was requested to method the High Court. was requested to
Thereafter, he once more filed an software earlier than the Supreme Court, urging an interim keep on the election notification.
,
With inputs from TheIndianEXPRESS
