Formula One is true to ban jewellery from the cockpit however the governing FIA may have enforced the rule in a much less confrontational method, in response to Grand Prix Drivers’ Association (GPDA) chairman Alex Wurz.
Seven-time world champion Lewis Hamilton and the FIA have been in a standoff at this month’s Miami Grand Prix over piercings the Mercedes driver has raced with for years and stated he couldn’t take away. learn extra
Hamilton has been advised to take them out by the Monaco Grand Prix on May 29 however has stated he has no intention of doing so. learn extra
“It is a rule for the right reasons,” former Benetton, McLaren and Williams driver Wurz, who’s closely concerned in driver security and schooling, advised Reuters.
“I might have in all probability favored a barely completely different method of how you can ship the message.
“I don’t want to end up in football where there are more hands in the air and verbal abuse…you have to work together. It’s a style I would have preferred in this case.”
The ban on jewelry, in addition to the carrying of non-compliant under-garments, has lengthy been within the guidelines however not often enforced till the FIA clamped down this season.
It says gadgets beneath the obligatory flameproof clothes may enhance the danger of burn accidents and has highlighted the danger of vital delays or problems if medical imaging is required following an accident.
FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem advised the Daily Mail final week he needed Hamilton to ship the proper message to younger drivers as a job mannequin.
Wurz stated he had by no means forgotten a chat he attended as a teenager given by Danish former racer Kris Nissen, who had a fiery sportscar crash at Japan’s Fuji circuit in 1988.
“He confirmed his physique and stated ‘take a look at this’,” recalled the 48-year-old.
“For him absolutely the most painful factor after fireplace, and it wasn’t a protracted fireplace, was the rubber (elastic) in his regular pants being burnt into the pores and skin. He stated (it was) for years agony and ache. And it educated me.
“At this second I stated I do not wish to stay these penalties, just for (not) taking my pants off and placing fireproof underpants on. The identical with jewelry.”
#F1: Lewis Hamilton will proceed to get medical exemptions for his piercings. One of the explanation why he stays defiant is as a result of wedding ceremony rings should be worn.
Are wedding ceremony rings not jewellery? Surely that is now not a “stand-off,” however a straight on focused assault. pic.twitter.com/VFxJNEAvC0
— deni (@fiagirly) May 8, 2022
MIAMI ADVICE
Wurz stated the GPDA was speaking to the FIA in regards to the physique’s refusal in Miami to defend a concrete wall with an energy-absorbing Tecpro barrier after Alpine’s Esteban Ocon and Ferrari’s Carlos Sainz crashed closely.
Several drivers accused the FIA of ignoring their considerations, though the physique stated it had listened to their recommendation however determined no modifications have been wanted.
Wurz stated hitting a concrete wall, even in a second gear nook, was going to harm.
A Tecpro barrier may virtually halve the G forces, he added, and imply a driver wouldn’t want medical checks and the chassis and gearbox would stay intact.
That would get monetary savings, with groups topic to finances caps, and take away the necessity to fly a broken chassis again to Europe, including to the carbon footprint.
Wurz stated the GPDA had been advised a barrier was accessible and will have been put in.
“Strictly talking we did not have an damage, so perhaps you possibly can say it (the barrier) is just not vital however we wish to say that if we had it, it will enhance the scenario,” he added.
“No research in the world can tell me it would have been a downside to put it (there).”
,
With inputs from TheIndianEXPRESS
