Legendary Sunil Gavaskar is perplexed as to why English umpires objected to Rishabh Pant’s stand exterior the crease through the ongoing third Test in opposition to England as they really feel the principles do not cease him from doing so.
After the primary day’s play at Headingley ended, the flamboyant wicketkeeper mentioned he needed to change his stance after the umpire instructed him to bat exterior the crease to disclaim swing within the hazard zone of the pitch.
But Gavaskar mentioned that footprints don’t decide a batsman’s stand.
“I was wondering why he was asked to change his stance, if that’s true. I only read it. The batsman can stand anywhere, even in the middle of the pitch and when the batsman spins. goes down the track against (even then footprints can form),” Gavaskar mentioned whereas commenting on the third day of the match.
His fellow commentator and former India participant Sanjay Manjrekar referred to as it “ridiculous”.
Pant spoke about this after India have been bowled out for 78 on the primary day of the match.
Pant mentioned through the digital post-day press convention on Wednesday, “Because I was standing outside the crease and my front-foot was coming into the danger zone, they (umpire) told me you can’t stand there. ” .
“So, I needed to change my stance, however as a cricketer, I needn’t assume a lot about it, as a result of it is everyone who’s going to do it, the umpires are going to say the identical factor. Don’t do it on the ball and you progress on.
The resolution was taken as soon as once more by two English umpires whether or not it’s time for the ICC to carry again its two impartial on-field umpires for Test matches which have been placed on maintain because of journey restrictions within the post-COVID-19 world.
.
With inputs from TheIndianEXPRESS
