central Amendment in pension guidelines for civil servants, barring retired officers of intelligence safety organizations from publishing something associated to their office, together with info associated to their expertise and experience, with out head approval, main the safety neighborhood to name it a digital lie order and “regressive ” Said.
Notifying the Central Civil Services (Pension) Amendment Rules, 2020, the Department of Personnel and Training launched this situation as an possibility clause within the guidelines on pension topic to good conduct in future.
This modification in rule 8 implies that pension could be withheld or withdrawn if the pensioner violates the principles – the retired officer must signal an endeavor to this impact.
This is more likely to have an effect on retired officers of safety and intelligence organizations who write within the press or creator books on their former organizations and experiences. Amending the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, the DoPT introduced in a clause imposing these restrictions on officers working in organizations exempted beneath the Right to Information Act.
These embody Intelligence Bureau, Research and Analysis Wing, CBI, Enforcement Directorate, Narcotics Control Bureau, DRDO and all Central Armed Police Forces like CRPF and BSF.
Former Indian Army Chief VP Malik, who led the military in the course of the Kargil War, felt it could be an final loss to the nation.
“The basic problem is not the pension rule, but that it will prevent people from writing. Pension is only a threat, the major issue being whether one should be able to write about their experience. My concern is that if you are not allowing people retiring from service to share their experience, how will one be able to pass on expert comments and analyze a particular incident and learn from those incidents… Will lose,” Malik mentioned.
Former BSF chief Prakash Singh, who has pushed for police reforms, mentioned the brand new guidelines are complete. “It is understandable to impose some restrictions in matters of national security. But the wording of the new rules appears to be superfluous. If necessary, a time limit of two-five years on retirement could have been introduced. It is like a blanket ban,” Singh mentioned.
Said former RAW chief AS Dulat, who has written a number of books and frequently writes on Kashmir within the press: “If the federal government points such an order, I’ll abide by it. What Choices Do I Have? But I would really like them to be carried out universally.”
Indian Express Reached out to over a dozen retired officers, together with two IB chiefs, three RAW chiefs, three CBI administrators, three CRPF administrators, two BSF administrators and one ITBP DG.
A former RAW chief mentioned: “Why do you need to jeopardize my pension? I’m fortunately main a retired life.” A former IB director said: “I’m out of Delhi and don’t know what is occurring within the capital.” Most others mentioned they had been unable to remark. Some spoke on the situation that they might not be named.
A former Raw chief mentioned: “The way the rules are stated, even if I have to say that the first Raw chief RN Kao was a great man, I have to get permission from the current Raw chief.” A former CBI chief mentioned because of this the conduct guidelines of serving officers have been prolonged until their lifetime.
A former IB official mentioned the brand new guidelines empower the federal government to punish anybody whose views it doesn’t like. “If you see that there isn’t any process talked about within the guidelines as to how the federal government will go about canceling the pension in case of violation. So I say one thing in a seminar or convention and also you freeze my pension. The authorities can hang-out you endlessly. Like officers, ministers even have data of secret information. What about them?” she mentioned.
However, authorities sources defended the brand new guidelines. “In the past, some intelligence and government officials have publicly expressed themselves by disclosing specific knowledge and sensitive information obtained on the basis of working in that organization. To bring clarity, these rules were issued,” A senior authorities official mentioned.
“In no way do these rules preclude any such former executives from expressing their views. In fact, it makes it easier… they can now approach the head of their former employer organization and seek clarification on the same. May the proposed material be sensitive or non-sensitive,” he mentioned.
.
With inputs from TheIndianEXPRESS
