Congress Rajya Sabha member KC Venugopal on External Affairs Minister on whether or not NRIs dwelling overseas had been harassed at airports and despatched again, and a few requested by officers to cease serving to farmers’ agitation , accepted provisionally and scheduled to be replied. on 2 December, however was dropped from the ultimate checklist of questions for that day.
Question (Provisionally Accepted Question Starred/Unstarred Diary No. U455) learn: “Will the Minister of EXTERNAL AFFAIRS be pleased to state (A) Whether it is a fact that many NRIs located outside India were harassed at airports and even from airports in the country; b) if so, the details thereof during the last three years; Was asked to stop helping the movement; d) if so, the details thereof?”
These questions had been to be answered by the Ministry of External Affairs on Monday, the day the Agricultural Laws Repeal Bill, 2021 was launched and handed by each the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha with none debate.
Sources mentioned mails had been despatched on November 23 to the involved divisions within the Ministry of External Affairs to hunt inputs by November 29 on the questions that had been accepted provisionally, together with that of Venugopal. However, Venugopal’s questions weren’t talked about within the tentative checklist of lastly accepted questions (FAQs). The ministry had given the nod on November 26.
When contacted, Venugopal instructed The Indian Express, “Earlier they used to present a transparent motive for leaving a query however this time they’ve said it solely orally. Another query I had on the restoration of Jallianwala Bagh was destroying its heritage. Pointing out {that a} member has the fitting to ask questions and search info from the federal government, he mentioned, “It is not ‘anti-national’… it is a clear dictatorial way of working without question in Parliament.” Allowed or argued which is wholly in opposition to the freedom of the member who has the fitting to ask Government questions.
The tentative checklist of questions for December 2 included lastly accepted questions on the next matters: easing of journey restrictions; improve relations with Taiwan; Hindi as one of many official languages of the United Nations; India-Afghanistan relations; Reciprocal Vaccine Certificate; Passport Seva Kendras in rural and semi-urban areas; Non-payment of wages and non-payment of wages overseas; 2nd India-New Zealand Bilateral Cyber Dialogue; Membership within the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG); Visit of overseas dignitaries to Sri Lanka and human rights violations in opposition to Tamils.
The closing authorized checklist for Rajya Sabha on December 2 consists of all of the questions accepted within the provisional checklist besides the query of Venugopal which was additionally lacking within the provisional checklist.
A questionnaire despatched to the Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson remained unanswered. When known as, the spokesperson of the Rajya Sabha Secretariat declined to remark.
The admissibility of questions within the Rajya Sabha is ruled by Rule 47-50 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business within the Council of States. Normally, as soon as a question which satisfies the eligibility situations is obtained, it’s forwarded to the involved Ministry. On receipt of info from the Ministry in response to the reference given by the Secretariat, the query is additional examined. It is on the sole discretion of the Speaker to just accept or reject questions. The printed lists of questions circulated to the ministers are the ultimate lists on the idea of which the ministries put together their solutions.
A senior authorities official, who didn’t want to be named, mentioned, “The query involved has been rejected as it’s nowhere talked about within the lastly accepted questions for its stipulated date. There are many such provisions below the foundations of Rajya Sabha which might take away a query. Rajya Sabha lists 22 situations of admissibility of a query.
Earlier this 12 months, through the monsoon session of parliament in August, the federal government had moved the Rajya Sabha to reject a query asking whether or not the federal government had signed a contract with Israeli cyber safety agency NSO Group. The NSO group was on the middle of a worldwide controversy over its alleged misuse of its Pegasus spy ware to faucet the telephones of journalists, activists and politicians.
The authorities then mentioned that the continuing subject of Pegasus was into consideration “after several PILs were filed in the Supreme Court”. Subsequently, it had written to the Rajya Sabha Secretariat demanding that the “provisionally accepted question” to be answered within the Rajya Sabha on August 12, 2021 by CPI MP Binoy Viswam shouldn’t be allowed.
“It will be noted that part (a) to (c) of PAQ seeks to know about the ongoing issue of Pegasus owned by NSO Group. Several PILs have been filed in the Supreme Court on this issue,” the letter mentioned. from which the matter is sub-judice.
Citing Rule 47 (xix) of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of the Council of States (Rajya Sabha) coping with admissibility of questions, the letter mentioned, an admitted query “shall not seek information on a matter which is decided by the court”. of regulation having jurisdiction in any a part of India”.
,
With inputs from TheIndianEXPRESS
