In the wake of the Magnus Carlsen-Hans Niemann fraud scandal, probably the most high-profile controversy to rock the chess world, a key member of the scandal has determined to talk out. Niemann’s childhood mentor Maxim Dlughi was talked about by Carlson within the wake of his allegations, speculating whether or not he had helped Niemann cheat previously. Dlughi’s personal repute has been tarnished when he was banned by Chess.com in 2017 and 2020 for fraudulent incidents.
In a current interview with Der Spiegel, Russian broke his silence, calling Carlson with none proof for “slanderous” claims in opposition to each him and Niemann.
“Two days before Magnus dropped my name in the interview, an old friend of mine approached me and asked about my relationship with Hans. I said I was not his coach, like his mentor,” he mentioned. “He requested what I assumed in regards to the fraud allegations. I mentioned they have been scandalous, ridiculous and cynical. There is not any proof,” he mentioned.
Magnus Carlsen and Hans Heimann. (Special illustration by Suvajit Dey)
Dalgi, himself a former grandmaster, revealed that he has identified Carlsen ever since they went face-to-face in blitz video games at Sinckfield Chess Club, in addition to a number of tandem video games that lasted till 4:30 within the morning. Having had a great relationship with him previously, he was shocked to listen to his title linked to the controversy.
“The shock was so great that they mentioned my name now,” he mentioned. “I had nothing to do with Hans at the time, I only gave him advice occasionally. And all of a sudden I’m dragged into it without Magnus thinking about what he’s doing to me. Why is he doing it? Is?”
Dlughi claimed that Carlsen’s accusations might have been motivated by the truth that Neiman ended his 52-game unbeaten streak – that he would not like Neiman and that he’s most likely a nasty loser. “Magnus was very upset that against Hans, his 52-match streak without defeat was broken. Maybe he also has a personal problem with Hans. He often behaves indecently. That’s how it is. Hans is Hans. , “They mentioned.
Dlughi issued a clarification on the incidents that led to him being banned from Chess.com after his e mail was leaked. He claimed that first, a chess lesson had gone mistaken when one in all his college students used laptop packages and AI to recommend strikes within the recreation, ideas he ended up taking. The second, in 2020, in line with him, was the results of a false confession when he was accused of fraud when he didn’t accomplish that.
“They told me I had 72 hours to confess. But I thought to myself: What a cheat? Look at the games, where should I have cheated? Cheat in the title Tuesday for me to win $500 or something There is no reason to give. I charge more for private chess lessons,” Dlughi insisted.
“But if I had not confessed, my account would have been suspended ceaselessly and everybody would have thought I used to be a cheater. I did not wish to take note of him once more, so I made a false confession, after which my account was unblocked. Chess.com instructed me all the pieces is confidential.”
Russian mentioned one of the simplest ways for Neiman to save lots of his repute is to go to courtroom, an possibility he retains open to himself, particularly after his Chase.com emails have been leaked. Dalugi mentioned he has determined to go public along with his aspect of the story after consulting with three completely different regulation companies.
“What Magnus did is absolutely ridiculous and very bad for chess,” he mentioned. “(I’m demanding) apologize to Magnus for dragging me into this. And apologies to Chess.com for publishing our confidential emails.
With inputs from TheIndianEXPRESS
