The Supreme Court on Monday upheld the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal’s (NCLAT) order winding up Dewas (Digitally Enhanced Video and Audio Services) Multimedia Pvt Ltd, which goals to supply video, multimedia and audio providers in affiliation with ISRO’s house arm Antrix Corporation. Information providers had been to be delivered. Satellite to cellular receiver in automobiles and cell phones throughout India.
The court docket mentioned it was “a case of fraud of a vast magnitude which cannot be hidden under the carpet in the form of a private suit”.
A bench of Justice Hemant Gupta and Justice V Ramasubramaniam dismissed Dewas’s plea. The court docket noticed that “the tribunal’s finding, (a) that in violation of public policy in India, a public donation was made in favor of Devas; (b) that Dewas asked Antrix/ISRO to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding.” solicited and promised to supply one thing after an settlement that didn’t exist on the time and which didn’t exist later; (c) that the licenses and approvals had been for fully totally different providers; and (d) that The providers supplied weren’t throughout the purview of the SATCOM coverage and so on. are literally borne by the file”.
Writing for the bench, Justice Ramasubramaniam noticed, “If the seeds of the commercial relationship between Antrix and Dewas were a product of fraud committed by Dewas, then every part of the plant that developed from those seeds would be like settlement, dispute, arbitration, etc. Prizes, etc., are all infused with the poison of fraud”.
The National Company Law Tribunal had on May 25, 2021 ordered closure of Dewas on a petition by Antrix. This was confirmed by the NCLAT on September 8, 2021.
In arbitral proceedings, the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Arbitral Tribunal handed an award on September 9, 2015 instructing Antrix to pay Dewas $562.5 million with easy curiosity on the fee of 18% each year.
Dewas, in his attraction earlier than the Supreme Court, argued that the actual motive behind Antrix to close down Dewas was to deprive Dewas of an ICC Tribunal award, and would ship a incorrect message to worldwide traders.
The prime court docket mentioned that it didn’t discover any advantage within the argument.
The judgment said that “a product of fraud is contrary to the public policy of any country including India. The core concepts of morality and justice are always opposed to fraud and hence the motive behind the action taken by the victim of fraud.” can by no means be a hindrance.
The prime court docket mentioned it was not conscious that Antrix’s motion to wind down Dewas might ship a incorrect message to the group of traders, however mentioned that “permitting Dewas and its shareholders to make the most of their fraudulent actions is yet one more might ship the incorrect message… that by adopting fraudulent strategies and bringing funding of Rs 579 crores into India, traders can count on to get hundreds of crores even after duping them of Rs 488 crores.
Dewas managed to usher in an funding of Rs 579 crore into India, however later moved Rs 488 crore in another country to arrange a subsidiary within the US.
The prime court docket didn’t agree with Dewas’s competition that the CBI’s FIR for offenses punishable beneath Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, learn with Section 120B IPC, has not but reached its logical conclusion.
,
With inputs from TheIndianEXPRESS
