The Supreme Court will pronounce its verdict on Thursday on petitions difficult the March 15 Karnataka High Court order dismissing a batch of petitions filed by Muslim women learning in pre-university faculties in Udupi. proper to put on hijab in school,
A two-judge bench of Justice Hemant Gupta and Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia will pronounce the decision at 10.30 am. The courtroom had on September 22 reserved its verdict within the matter after listening to in depth arguments from the petitioners in addition to the state authorities.
The HC held that carrying hijab is just not a needed spiritual follow in Islam and freedom of faith is topic to affordable restrictions underneath Article 25 of the Constitution, and in addition upheld an order issued by the state on February 5, which recommended Was it attainable to put on a hijab. ought to be banned in authorities faculties the place uniforms are prescribed, and dominated that such restrictions are “constitutionally permissible” underneath the norms of school uniforms.
Appealing towards this, some Muslim college students approached the Supreme Court stating that “the right to wear the hijab falls within the purview of ‘expression’ and is thus protected under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.” ” They argued that the correct to put on the hijab is protected by a ‘proper of conscience’ underneath Article 25 of the Constitution, which is a person proper, and that the HC shouldn’t have imposed a ‘required spiritual follow take a look at’.
The All Indian Muslim Personal Law Board had additionally appealed towards the HC’s determination that “as far as the interpretation of scriptures in the Holy Quran is concerned, there is a general consensus among religious scholars … that the practice of hijab” Wajib’ (compulsory), a set of obligations which, if not carried out, will ‘sin’ or turn into ‘sinner’.”
The HC order got here on the finish of intense protests, with a piece of scholars carrying saffron shawls protesting towards hijab-wearers in pre-university faculties.
Pointing out that “women are revolting” even in constitutionally Islamic nations reminiscent of Iran, the Karnataka authorities informed the Supreme Court throughout the listening to that some school growth committees within the state would chorus from banning the hijab of their respective instructional establishments. What got here out earlier was not “spontaneous” however “part of a larger conspiracy”.
The state mentioned that earlier no scholar had worn the hijab however in 2022 an agitation began on social media by the now banned Popular Front of India. It was “created to create a movement of sorts based on people’s religious sentiments, and as a part, there were frequent social media messages that (say), start wearing the hijab”.
The state additionally denied allegations that the ban was meant to focus on the minority group and mentioned the federal government was pressured to intervene due to the scenario.
With inputs from TheIndianEXPRESS
