‘There had been higher methods to deal with this example’: FIDE criticizes Carlsen’s conduct in Neiman saga able to work Fair Play fee

0
68
‘There had been higher methods to deal with this example’: FIDE criticizes Carlsen’s conduct in Neiman saga able to work Fair Play fee

Two days after Magnus Carlsen resigned in his rematch in opposition to Hans Niemann after making just one transfer, the International Chess Federation (FIDE) named the five-time world champion for his conduct within the ongoing saga between the Norwegian and American GM. has been criticized.

In a press release made public, FIDE’s president, Arkady Dvorkovic, stated, “We strongly believe that world champions have a moral responsibility attached to their status, as they are viewed as the sport’s global ambassadors.”

“Their actions affect the reputation of their partners, the outcome of the game, and can ultimately be detrimental to our sport. We strongly believe that there were better ways to handle this situation.”

The sport’s world governing physique, nevertheless, additional said that they shared Carlsen’s considerations over dishonest within the sport and that the physique stood able to act on its Fair Play Commission.

“We share their deepest considerations concerning the injury dishonest may cause to chess. FIDE has led the combat in opposition to dishonest for a few years, and we reiterate our zero-tolerance coverage in direction of dishonest in any type. Whether it’s on-line or “over the board”, dishonest stays. We are strongly dedicated to this combat, and now we have invested in constructing a bunch of specialists to develop subtle preventive measures that Already apply in prime FIDE occasions.

The assertion additional learn, “FIDE stands ready to conduct a thorough investigation of the incident to its Fair Play Commission, when sufficient preliminary evidence is provided, and all parties involved to disclose the information at their disposal. We are fully aware that uncertainty in some cases can harm players’ performance. It can also be detrimental to a player’s reputation – that’s why we insist on following anti-cheating protocols.”

“It is our hope that this entire scenario can have a long-term constructive influence, whether it is handled correctly. We suggest to launch a devoted panel, consisting of representatives of main chess platforms, grandmasters, anti-cheating specialists and FIDE officers, to combat this danger and forestall it from changing into an actual plague.”

Carlsen, 31, made headlines when he pulled out of a event for the primary time in his profession after dropping to Neiman within the $500,000 Sinckfield Cup earlier this month. The Norwegian introduced this with a tweet from a video of Portuguese soccer supervisor Jose Mourinho saying, “If I speak up, I’m in big trouble. Big, big trouble”, with Carlsen refusing to supply any additional clarification. . But the chess world started to take a position that this was resulting from Neiman’s fraud.

Neiman, however, denounced all of the allegations in opposition to him and stated that he was able to play bare to show his innocence.

Less than two weeks later, the 2 met once more in a rematch in an internet match on the Julius Baer Cup. A gathering that was lower brief as a result of Carlsen logged off earlier than taking his second transfer. After this although, the five-time world champion made a press release on his views on Nieman.

“I feel completely different folks will reply the query otherwise primarily based on their very own experiences. Whether or not it is a large drawback, I feel it is pretty simple to cheat and, on the whole, I feel in future cheaters on-line or on board shouldn’t be taken frivolously,” he informed Chess24.com.


With inputs from TheIndianEXPRESS

Leave a reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here