The CBI has instructed the Supreme Court that there seems to be an “attempt to interfere and endanger” the probe into corruption allegations towards former Maharashtra Home Minister Anil Deshmukh.
In an affidavit filed within the high court docket, the CBI, which performed the probe following the Bombay High Court order, referred to the SC’s November 22 order detailing an trade between former Mumbai Police Commissioner Parambir Singh and his successor Sanjay Pandey. was famous.
“From reading… it appears prima facie that there has been a clear attempt to interfere with the court investigation conducted by the CBI and further, to jeopardize the same,” the company stated.
Considering this, the CBI urged the court docket to “ensure that such attempts by various quarters are thwarted forever”.
The CBI additionally stated that media stories counsel that makes an attempt are being made to sabotage the investigation by registering instances with overlapping ramifications.
On Tuesday, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta formulated the company’s considerations. “The overlapping is so obvious that my apprehension is that the state police may do something, which will make the court’s job more difficult. A coverup or something…” he instructed a bench of Justices SK Kaul and MM Sundaresh.
The apex court docket’s November 22 order, referring to the transcript of the trade between Singh and Pandey, stated, “The sum and essence of the discussion was that the matter was taken up by the commissioner, who asked him (Singh) to make arrangements.” And in reality withdraw the letter despatched to the Chief Minister (Uddhav Thackeray) complaining towards the Home Minister (Deshmukh), in any other case the outcomes could also be different.”
The CBI had filed this affidavit in response to a petition filed by Singh, searching for at hand over the instances registered by the Maharashtra Police towards him to the CBI, as they’re associated to the instances towards Deshmukh.
Responding to the petition, the CBI stated within the affidavit that some instances towards Singh are overlapping and also needs to be given “for a full, thorough and impartial investigation”.
Pointing out that its investigation is continuing, the CBI stated that in the meantime “it has been learned in the news… media that attempts are being made to sabotage the investigation”. with) resorting to overlapping affect on the investigation of the case “by the CBI”.
Referring to an FIR registered on this regard at Mumbai’s Goregaon Police Station on July 20, 2021, the CBI stated that “topic to an in depth evaluation of the investigation of the State of Maharashtra within the preliminary … Attempt at hand over investigation towards Deshmukh [CBI], and the Supreme Court on April 8 final yr dismissed the attraction difficult the HC’s course.
The HC’s order got here on a PIL by Mumbai-based lawyer Jayshree Laxmanrao Patil, which cited Singh’s eight-page letter to Maharashtra Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray, alleging that Deshmukh had requested Assistant Police Inspector Sachin Vaze to gather $100 per 30 days. Was requested to gather Rs. Rs 40 crore to Rs 50 crore from 1,750 bars and eating places in Mumbai.
Vaze is presently within the custody of the NIA in reference to the bomb scare.
On November 22, the SC had granted Singh interim safety from arrest, whereas permitting the state police to proceed with its probe. It sought a response from the CBI on Singh’s request that the instances towards him be handed over to the central company.
On Tuesday, the bench instructed Singh’s counsel, “This is the same police force that you were leading. Now… the head of the police force has no confidence in the police force; The administration does not trust the police. It’s a disturbing scenario.”
The bench adjourned the matter after it was identified that Maharashtra had filed an attraction difficult the Bombay HC order refusing to nominate a SIT to probe the allegations leveled towards Deshmukh by Singh. Was.
,
With inputs from TheIndianEXPRESS
