The Kerala High Court on Thursday stated it won’t keep the Crime Branch probe in opposition to actor Dileep and others within the case accusing them of conspiring to kill and threatening officers investigating the 2017 actress assault case.
“The investigation cannot be stayed,” Justice Ok Haripal stated after the attorneys showing for the actor and different accused sought a keep of the probe until the court docket lastly hears and decides Dileep’s plea to quash the case or switch the matter to CBI.
Senior advocate B Raman Pillai and advocates Philip T Varghese and Thomas T Varghese, showing for the actor and the opposite accused, sought a keep of the probe after the court docket stated that the matter requires detailed listening to and due to this fact, it may be taken up after the High Court’s summer season trip from April 11 to May 17.
As the court docket declined to cross any interim order staying the probe, the actor’s attorneys sought an earlier date of listening to saying that there was urgency within the matter.
The court docket granted the request for an earlier date of listening to and listed the matter on March 28 for closing arguments.
Dileep has contended within the court docket that the Crime Branch has levelled “false and fabricated” of destruction of proof in opposition to him and the opposite accused in addition to their attorneys.
The actor, in his reply to a current assertion filed by the Crime Branch, has claimed that the company and its officers are investigating the newest case in opposition to him, have been “peddling lies after lies”.
The Crime Branch assertion, filed by means of further public prosecutor P Narayanan, had are available response to Dileep’s plea to quash the homicide conspiracy FIR or switch the probe to CBI.
The company had alleged in its assertion that Dileep’s plea to quash the FIR was a “bundle of lies and distorted facts.”
It had claimed that the actor and the opposite accused in addition to their attorneys have been concerned in tampering or destruction of the proof within the case.
Denying the cost, the actor has contended that baseless allegations have been “fabricated” by the investigating company with regard to the telephones submitted by him and others, together with his brother and brother-in-law, for forensic evaluation.
In his reply, the actor has stated the aim of the forensic examination of the telephones “presently and recently used by the accused” was to not discover out materials concerning the 2017 case, however to conduct a “roving enquiry” into the information contained in them for making false.
“The dishonest nature of the investigation, has turn out to be the trademark of the police, which 2,3 and 5 (from the tales officers), is clear from the tales planted by them within the media concerning the telephones of the accused.
“The allegation that the petitioner (Dileep) and other accused removed and concealed their mobile phones within a few days of disclosure of offenses by Balachandra Kumar is an incorrect and misleading statement,” the actor has stated in his reply.
It was primarily based on sure revelations by Kumar that the police initiated additional probe within the 2017 case and in addition lodged a recent FIR with regard to alleged conspiracy to homicide and intimidate the officers investigating the sooner matter.
The actor has claimed that the cellphones have been despatched to a cellular forensic professional to extract information from them concerning communications with Kumar to confront him with the identical if he was made a prosecution witness and the choice to take action was taken a lot earlier than the recent case was registered.
He additionally claimed that extraction, restoration or deletion of knowledge from a telephone by its consumer was neither clandestine nor unlawful and concerning the clearing of 12 WhatsApp messages from his telephone, the actor has contended that the identical is a daily course of adopted by many customers of the messaging platform.
The actor additionally contended that “no tampering of any of the phones or shredding of any data from the phones has been detected by the FSL”, opposite to the “vague and false” claims by the Crime Branch.
He has additional claimed, in his reply, that the allegation of Crime Branch that the actor’s attorneys assisted in destruction of prosecution proof was “fanciful, preposterous and baseless”.
“Such an allegation has been recklessly and irresponsibly fabricated so as to scandalize them,” Dileep has claimed.
Meanwhile, the actress-victim has lodged a grievance with the Bar Council of Kerala in opposition to senior advocate B Raman Pillai and the opposite attorneys who symbolize Dileep and the opposite accused, and has sought an inquiry into whether or not there was any skilled misconduct by them.
The grievance was returned by the attorneys physique saying that it was not filed in accordance with the principles and requested her to re-file it.
The actor and 5 others have been booked beneath varied provisions of the Indian Penal Code, together with Sections 116 (abetment), 118 (concealing design to commit offence), 120B (prison conspiracy), 506 (prison intimidation), and 34 (prison act carried out) by a number of folks).
The actress-victim, who has labored in Tamil, Telugu and Malayalam movies, was kidnapped and allegedly molested in her automobile for 2 hours by some individuals who had compelled their approach into the automobile on the night time of February 17, 2017 and later escaped in a busy space. The total act was filmed by these individuals to blackmail the actress.
There are 10 accused within the 2017 case and police have arrested seven. Dilip was arrested later and launched on bail.
,
With inputs from TheIndianEXPRESS
