The Supreme Court on Thursday advised Andhra Pradesh that it isn’t satisfied concerning the precautionary measures advised by the state for conducting Class 12 board exams and mentioned that until it’s glad that there can be no demise on account of COVID, it can won’t enable them.
The prime courtroom mentioned it might additionally look into the compensation facet in a demise case like in lots of different states the place Rs 1 crore is given for demise on account of COVID-19. A particular bench of Justice AM Khanwilkar and Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, which requested robust inquiries to the Andhra Pradesh authorities on its determination to carry class 12 board exams, requested state standing counsel Mahfouz A Nazki to put a “snapshot” earlier than the courtroom. the place file” stating the rationale for conducting the check.
“We are not satisfied with the precautionary measures taken by you to conduct the examination. We are not convinced by the mechanism you have prepared. Unless we are satisfied that you are able to conduct the examination without any death, we will not allow you to conduct the examination”, the bench mentioned.
“We have to look at the compensation aspect in case of any death during the exam. Some states have given a compensation of Rs 1 crore for the death due to COVID. We can look at things from that aspect.”
Read | AP Inter 2nd Year Exam By July End, Time Table Will Release Soon
The prime courtroom is listening to a plea looking for instructions to state governments to not conduct board exams in view of the COVID-19 pandemic. During the listening to, the apex courtroom expressed its specific concern over accommodating 5,19,510 college students in lessons for the examination and noticed that the state authorities says that there can be a most of 15 to 18 college students in a category. “If we go by your figure, for 15 students per class, you would need 34,644 rooms and if we take 18 students per class then you would need 28,862 rooms. Tell us from where do you get all these rooms”, the bench mentioned.
It advised Nazki, “Don’t hold exams for the sake of exams. It is not only 5 lakh students who are appearing for the exam, more than one lakh people including 34,000 invigilators for each room will be involved in the process. You also have to think about their health and safety.” The bench mentioned the state ought to remember the impression of the second COVID-19 wave, how briskly it emerged and the way it will cope when the third wave hits. .
“Do you’ve got a contingency plan? If you get hit by the third wave or if there may be an unfair scenario how will you cope with it? We have not seen something like that in your affidavit. There’s nothing right here to show You should have given some thought to the well being and security of scholars and academics”, the bench mentioned. Nazki mentioned the large drawback is that solely grades are given to college students in Class 10 and there’s no mechanism for evaluating college students.
“We perceive your problem changing grades into marks or evaluating college students could be an issue. But there are ten options to each drawback. You speak about consultants. You can discuss to UGC, CBSE, CISCE or different states and consultants and work out a method. Many states had issues however they’ve determined to cancel the examinations.
The prime courtroom additionally expressed its concern that Andhra Pradesh has not talked about the timeline for the examination or outcomes and requested the state to specify the identical to keep away from any uncertainty within the minds of the scholars. “You cannot maintain issues unsure. We need to have a concrete plan by tomorrow if you wish to conduct the examination. We need to know what your COVID Protocol Management is and the way you’ll implement it. You should be conscious that the primary and second COVID are completely different and in keeping with consultants the third wave can even be completely different. Alert has been issued for delta variant in Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Kerala”, the bench mentioned.
The prime courtroom requested Nazki to file an affidavit by Friday stating the whole plan and explaining to the courtroom that it has all the mandatory means to cope with any emergency. “We want a complete stop of things. From transportation of students and teachers, to classes and their seating arrangements, to ensure maintenance of COVID protocols or we will direct you not to conduct examinations”, the bench mentioned. It has been determined to cancel the examination.On the bottom actuality.
Read | Supreme Court expresses displeasure over AP’s determination to conduct intermediate exams
The bench additionally thought of the affidavit of Kerala, which mentioned that it has already performed class 12 board exams and it’ll conduct class 11 exams within the month of September. The prime courtroom mentioned that it’s contemplating the petition on the category 12 board examination and if the scholars of Kerala have any grievance relating to the category 11 examination, they’ll strategy the excessive courtroom there.
In its affidavit, the Andhra Pradesh authorities had advised the highest courtroom that it could be capable to efficiently conduct the category 12 exams as there are not any credible alternate options to evaluate the state board college students. On Monday, the apex courtroom was knowledgeable by the Assam, Tripura and Karnataka governments that they’ve canceled their state boards of sophistication 12 board exams as a result of pandemic.
On June 17, the apex courtroom was knowledgeable that out of 28 states, six states have already performed board exams, 18 states have canceled them, however 4 states (Assam, Punjab, Tripura and Andhra Pradesh). Haven’t canceled them. Now.
.
With inputs from TheIndianEXPRESS
