‘Your speechwriter must be fired’: Owaisi to Rajnath on Gandhi-Savarkar remarks

Sharing on Twitter a letter written by Gandhi to Savarkar’s brother on January 25, 1920, in reference to a case, Owaisi accused Singh of “diverting” what Gandhi had written.

“Sir Rajnath Singh, you mentioned that Savarkar’s mercy petition was on Gandhi’s recommendation. Here is Savarkar’s letter from Gandhi. There isn’t any point out of the petition of the British begging for leniency, mercy and promising to be trustworthy servants of the Taj,” he mentioned.

Sir Rajnath Singh You mentioned that Savarkar’s mercy petition was on the recommendation of Gandhi.

1. Here is Gandhi’s letter to Savarkar. There isn’t any point out of the plea of ​​the British begging for leniency, mercy and guarantees to be trustworthy servants of the Taj. 1/n pic.twitter.com/5asdmBVqss

— Asaduddin Owaisi (@asadowaisi) 13 October 2021

The AIMIM chief additional mentioned that the primary petition that Savarkar wrote was in 1911, six months after he was in jail, when Gandhi was in South Africa. He mentioned that Savarkar wrote once more in 1913/14 and that Gandhi’s recommendation is from 1920. “Is it a lie that this ‘Veer’ rejected the tricolor and wanted Bhagavad as our flag?” he questioned.

Further, citing Rajnath’s speech through which the minister talked about that Savarkar had outlined a Hindu as somebody for whom India was the fatherland or motherland, Owaisi mentioned that “Savarkar, a man of limited intellectual prowess As in, actually defined Hindu as someone for whom India was the fatherland and holy land.”

In his view, India was not a holy land for Muslims and Christians and therefore they might not be utterly loyal to India. What is your view on this as Defense Minister? Do you subscribe to this precept? 4/n

— Asaduddin Owaisi (@asadowaisi) 13 October 2021

“IMHO, whoever wrote this speech for you should be fired. It is not good to have such consultants who have a relationship with the truth of Savarkarite,” he tweeted.

During the launch of a ebook on Savarkar on the Ambedkar International Centre, which additionally featured RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat, on Tuesday, Rajnath Singh alleged that there was a deliberate conspiracy to defame Savarkar, and that on Gandhi’s recommendation, he had Wrote mercy petitions. .

“Lots of lies have been unfold towards Savarkar. It was repeatedly said that he filed a number of mercy petitions earlier than the British Government. In reality, he didn’t file these petitions for his launch. Normally a prisoner has the proper to file mercy petition. Mahatma Gandhi had mentioned that you must file a mercy petition. It was on Gandhi’s suggestion that he filed a mercy petition. And Mahatma Gandhi had appealed to launch Savarkar ji. He had mentioned that the way in which we’re working a motion for freedom peacefully, Savarkar will do the identical.

He mentioned that Savarkar had truly impressed individuals to interrupt the shackles of slavery and agitated towards untouchability amongst many different social points together with ladies’s rights. However, his contribution to the cultural unity of the nation was missed, Singh mentioned.

Meanwhile, the copy of Gandhi’s letter to SD Savarkar shared by Owaisi mentioned, “I have your letter. It’s hard to give you advice. However, I suggest that you prepare a short petition presenting the facts of the case to give clear relief that the offense committed by your brother was purely political. I suggest this so that public attention can be focused on the matter. In the meantime, as I have told you in an earlier letter, I am going my own way in this matter.”

Congress chief Jairam Ramesh, Shiv Sena MP Sanjay Raut and Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Bhupesh Baghel additionally hit out at Rajnath over his remarks.

Sharing the identical letter on Twitter, Ramesh mentioned, “Rajnath Singhji is among the few calm and respectful voices in the Modi government. But it seems they are not free from the RSS habit of rewriting history. He has put a twist in what Gandhi actually wrote on 25 January 1920. Here is the letter to Savarkar’s brother.” Further, including that Singh had “explicitly taken out of context Gandhi’s letter dated January 25, 1920,” the Congress chief mentioned, “Not stunning Is. It is similar for BJP-RSS.

Raut mentioned that Veer Savarkar by no means apologized to the British. Speaking to reporters in Pune, Raut mentioned freedom fighters who’re in jail for greater than ten years might undertake ways pondering that they’ll do one thing after popping out of jail as an alternative of staying inside. Raut mentioned a special technique is adopted in politics or whereas serving a sentence.

“If Savarkar had adopted such a strategy, it cannot be called an apology. It may be that Savarkar has done this (tactics adopted). It cannot be called an apology. Savarkar never apologized to the British,” he mentioned.

Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Bhupesh Baghel argued How might Gandhi talk with the imprisoned Savarkar?

“Where was Mahatma Gandhi and the place was Savarkar at the moment? Savarkar was in jail. How might they impart?” Baghel was quoted as saying by ANI.

“He (Savarkar) filed a mercy petition from jail and continued to live with the British,” the Congress chief mentioned. Baghel additionally claimed that Savarkar was the primary to talk of the two-nation idea after popping out of jail in 1925.

Meanwhile, Savarkar’s grandson, Ranjit Savarkar, claimed that the liberty fighter had provided a basic apology to all political prisoners, PTI reported. He additionally mentioned that if the liberty fighters had apologized to the British, they’d have been given some posts.

On Gandhi, he informed reporters in Mumbai, “Thousands of people have contributed in building this nation, which has a history of more than 5,000 years. I don’t think Mahatma Gandhi is the father of the nation,” nobody is demanding that Savarkar be known as the daddy of the nation, as a result of “that concept was not acceptable to him”.