‘ICC equal factors per Test win from subsequent WTC cycle’

0
72

ICC interim CEO Geoff Allardyce mentioned the much-discussed World Test Championship factors system is ready to endure a change through the second version, the place all groups will get “the same standardized points” for profitable a recreation as a substitute of being allotted 120 per collection. . Monday.

During the earlier cycle, every collection was value 120 factors, with 60 factors for a win within the two-match India-Bangladesh collection, whereas 30 factors per win within the four-match India-Australia Test collection.

However, with many collection being canceled through the closing stage, the ICC reverted to the proportion factors system, the place a group’s rating was calculated based mostly on factors divided by the variety of matches performed.

“We have seen it at the end of this cycle as well and we have a second cycle starting in a month and a half and there will be some changes in the points system,” Allardyce mentioned throughout an interplay with choose media retailers.

“…we are able to put an ordinary variety of factors per Test match, in order that it would not matter whether or not it’s a two-Test collection or a five-Test collection, the identical variety of factors will likely be accessible for every match performed.

“But every team will be judged by its winning percentage, not the total,” Allardyce defined.

He mentioned that whereas COVID-19 wreaked havoc on the calendar, the India-New Zealand closing is a good final result contemplating all of the postponements.

“One of the things that happened during this cycle was that it became clear that not everyone was going to complete their six series as a result of the postponement due to COVID,” he argued.

“Since we now have groups taking part in an uneven variety of collection, we now have made it a degree to tweak the factors system and make it as truthful as potential and make sure that it displays the matches we performed reasonably than the collection. have been extra affected. We did not play.”

Allardyce felt it was a “fair system” as New Zealand didn’t play a collection because of the COVID associated postponement, however they nonetheless managed to qualify on the energy of their efficiency within the second collection.

“We preferred not to change the points system in the middle of the tournament, but (because) because of the circumstances due to COVID, we needed to ensure that the best two teams reach the final.”

The three-match closing was prompt by India coach Ravi Shastri, which he believes is a perfect evaluation of a group’s efficiency graph over a two-year interval, however Allardyce has discovered a sensible method round that concept. pointed to difficulties.

“In an ideal world, a three-Test series would be a great way to decide the WTC but the reality of the international cricket schedule is that we are not going to get a month.”

“… it is not realistic to hold off a month for the finals of all team tournaments, so the final of a match was decided. Why is it quite exciting as it brings something new. We have one to decide. The test match of the bar is that we have the best Test team in the world.”

He additionally felt that even when the climate turns dangerous, the reserve day to cowl time for 5 days of Test cricket is nice sufficient and if there isn’t a outcome, then declaring joint winners is a good deal.

“One of the traits of Test cricket is {that a} draw is a outcome. We did not wish to begin a closing with one group profitable and one group on the lookout for a draw.”

“Both groups begin taking part in Friday even and 5 days to get the outcome and we now have a reserve day in order that if time is misplaced, it may be made up on the reserve day. This shouldn’t be a six-day take a look at match.

“And after five days if we don’t get a winner, whether you like it or not, a draw in Test cricket is a fair result,” he signed off.

.
With inputs from TheIndianEXPRESS

Leave a reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here